COMP/135/2011 37/49 ORDER jurisdiction. The aforesaid parameters of the scope and ambit of the jurisdiction of the Company Court which is called upon to sanction a Scheme of Compromise and Arrangement are not exhaustive but only broadly illustrative of the contours of the Court's jurisdiction.” 10. In this background now, at the outset, it is relevant and appropriate to take into consideration the facts emerging from the record of present petition. It comes out that the Board of Directors of both the companies have, after considering the report of the independent valuer and other financial adviser, approved the proposed scheme and thereafter the scheme was placed for consideration and approval by the shareholders/members of the companies. It is mentioned in the proposed scheme that the shareholders of the transferor company have approved the proposed scheme. So far as the transferee company is concerned, the report of the Chairman of the meeting convened pursuant to the orders of the Court reveals that the statutory majority of shareholders/members of the petitioner – transferor company have also approved the scheme. It is also declared by the petitioner company in the affidavits filed by it that the concerned stock exchanges have also not raised any objections against the proposed scheme and have not found anything objectionable in the provisions under the scheme. The authorities viz. the Regional Director and the Registrar of Companies have also observed that anything objectionable and/or prejudicial to the interest of the company and/or interest of the shareholders or creditors or public has not been found in the scheme and the scheme does not appear to be prejudicial to the interest of the company or the members or the creditors or the public. The Registrar of Companies has, in the report submitted to the Regional Director, Downloaded on : Fri Jan 27 19:33:28 IST 2023