COMP/135/2011 2/49 ORDER Court, St. Denis Street, Port Louis, Mauritius. 2.1. Before taking out present petition the petitioner company had taken out Company Application No.400 of st 2011 wherein under order dated 1 August 2011 the petitioner company was directed to convene meeting of Equity Shareholders. It is claimed that the directions requiring the company to follow the procedure to convene meeting of the Equity Shareholders was duly followed and th the meeting was convened on 12 September 2011 as directed by the Court. The petitioner has claimed that the affidavit of compliance of publication of notice and other procedure has been filed on the record of the said application. It is also claimed that the resolution approving the proposed Scheme came to be passed by requisite majority of 95.76% in number and 99.99% in value by the Equity Shareholders present and voting at the meeting. It is also claimed that the Chairman of the meeting has filed his report with supporting affidavit th dated 17 September 2011. On perusal of the said report it comes out that the Chairman has reported that: “1. The meeting of Equity Shareholders was attended either personally or through proxy by 132 (One Hundred and Thirty Two) Equity Shareholders of the Company representing 170,80,12,463 (One Hundred and Seventy Crores Eighty Lacs Twelve Thousand Four Hundred and Sixty Three) Equity Shares aggregating to Rs.17,08,01,24,630/- (Rupees Seventeen Hundred and Eight Crores One Lac Twenty Four thousand Six Hundred and Thirty only) comprising of 53 (Fifty Three) Equity Shareholders in person, 2 (Two) through the Authorised Representatives and 77 (Seventy Seven) Equity Shareholders through proxy. 3. The result of the voting upon the said question was as follows: (i) Out of 132 shareholders who have attended the meeting (either in person or by proxy or through Authorised Downloaded on : Fri Jan 27 19:33:28 IST 2023